James McCabe vs Jacob Fearnley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 03:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. McCabe vs J. Fearnley

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McCabe 1 - 0 Fearnley
They have played 2 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 1 and Jacob Fearnley winning 1. The last match between James McCabe and Jacob Fearnley was at the Sumter Challenger, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-5 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McCabe | 1 |
| Fearnley | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Sumter Challenger(08-13-25)
J. McCabe vs J. Fearnley H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $358,055 | Career Prize Money | $919,075 |
| 56.85% (166-126) | Career Total W/L | 70.20% (106-45) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (16-20) |
J. McCabe vs J. Fearnley Match Preview:
- Analyzing second serve performance over the last six months, Fearnley and Mc Cabe show nearly identical stats, with Mc Cabe having a slight edge winning 44.13% compared to Fearnley's 43.87%. What does this imply? It suggests a marginal advantage for Mc Cabe in this metric.
- Regarding the return game, Fearnley slightly outperforms Mc Cabe, capturing 47.3% of opponents' second serve points against Mc Cabe's 46.94%. Moreover, Fearnley also leads in first serve return success at 23.19% compared to Mc Cabe's 22.17%. Can these small differences impact predictions? Yes, as they highlight Fearnley’s better return game.
- Under pressure, Mc Cabe has excelled in saving 57.2% of breakpoints, surpassing Fearnley's 53.8%. This could influence in-game predictions, showing Mc Cabe’s resilience.
- In overall match performance over the past year, Fearnley has a striking W/L of 44/24, translating to a 64.71% win rate, while Mc Cabe has yet to secure a victory, remaining at 0% (W/L 0/0). Does this give Fearnley a substantial lead? Absolutely, it indicates Fearnley's greater experience and success.
- When considering playing surfaces, Fearnley shines on indoor hard courts with an 82% win rate, demonstrating a clear preference and strength. Mc Cabe’s best and worst surfaces remain unspecified, leaving questions about their versatility.
- Fearnley’s participation in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with an 80.77% success rate provides a competitive edge, as Mc Cabe lacks match success in this context.
- Fearnley has faced opponents with an average ranking of 164.97 over the last year, while Mc Cabe’s competition level is unclear, suggesting Fearnley’s exposure to tougher competition.
- In deciding set situations, Fearnley excels, winning 73% of these tense matches compared to Mc Cabe's 0%, which could be crucial if the match becomes tightly contested.
- Finally, Fearnley’s break point conversion rate of 30.92% also presents an advantage over Mc Cabe’s 26.74%, highlighting superior opportunistic play.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, analyzing the available statistics provides a compelling narrative about which player holds the potential advantage. Fearnley emerges as the more seasoned player, boasting a notable track record in victories and resilient performances under challenging match scenarios.
While Mc Cabe shows promise with slightly better stats in a few areas, the lack of match wins in the past year raises questions about their competitive edge. Fearnley's ability to perform in high-pressure situations, coupled with an impressive conversion rate and exposure to higher-ranked opponents, sets a reliable foundation for predicting match outcomes.
Considering these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that Fearnley is more likely to clinch the win in the upcoming tennis showdown, capitalizing on their consistent track record and superior matchplay experience.
James McCabe vs Jacob Fearnley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. McCabe vs J. Fearnley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 10 | Games Won | 11 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:43:55 | Average Match Time | 1:43:55 |
| 56% (36/64) | 1st Serve % | 48% (33/69) |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (26/33) |
| 54% (15/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 35% (24/69) | Return Points Win % | 34% (22/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played
J. Fearnley Recent Matches Played

J. McCabe vs J. Fearnley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.85% (166/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.20% (106/45) |
| 54.71% (372/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.49% (227/125) |
| 51.67% (3374/3156) | Games Win/Loss | 55.38% (1822/1468) |
| 60.09% (137/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.96% (31/16) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 78.79% (52/14) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2006 | Aces Total | 712 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 654 | Total Double Faults | 664 |
| 1:43:43 | Average Match Time | 1:29:4 |
| 370.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 220.26 |
| 60% (11880/19778) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5896/9642) |
| 72% (8605/11880) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (4304/5896) |
| 49% (3874/7898) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1868/3746) |
| 41% (707/1740) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (453/1016) |
| 37% (7353/19625) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4046/9958) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 58.82% (10/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 52.26% (81/74) | Challenger W/L | 79.59% (39/10) |
| 70.87% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 81.82% (36/8) |
| 57% (159/279) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (100/138) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 52% (66/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (23/40) |
| 58% (53/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (30/40) |
| 87% (155/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (91/86) |
| 13% (155/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (91/4) |
| 23% (137/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (60/20) |